| 3,653 | 216 | 300 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
随着认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作的开展,律师辩护的重心将由法庭前移至审查起诉阶段,律师在审前程序中的作用得以凸显:一是保障认罪的自愿性;二是保障认罚的允当性;三是保障程序选择的正确性;四是保障被追诉人诉讼权利行使的客观理性。为此,需要将现有的"权利配置型"值班律师模式改造为"强制辩护型"辩护人模式,并赋予律师在侦查机关讯问犯罪嫌疑人时的在场权;同时,适当保持认罪认罚程序的灵活性,允许控辩双方就罪名和量刑事项进行平等协商。在认罪认罚问题上,辩护人仅仅是咨询者、建议者、协助者,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人才是认罪认罚的最终决定者。
Abstract:With the practice of the pilot work of the confession lenient system,the focus of the lawyers' defense has moved from the stage of trial to the stage of review and prosecution and the role of lawyers in the pre-trial procedure has been highlighted in four aspects: i) ensuring voluntariness of confession; ii) ensuring the appropriateness of sentence acception; iii) ensuring the correctness of the selected procedures; iv) ensuring the objective rationality of the defendants' exercising of procedural rights.Consequently,it is necessary to transform the current mode of"right-allocation-style"lawyers on duty into that of"mandatory-defense-style"defenders and endow lawyers with the right to be present at the places where the criminal investigation organs interrogate the suspects; furthermore,the confession procedures should maintain flexibility and the accusers and the accused are allowed to have equal consultation of accusation and sentencing matters. In confession,defenders are only consultants,advisers and helpers,and only suspects and defendants can make the final decision.
[1]熊选国.刑事诉讼法实施中的疑难问题[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2005:348.
[2]孔令勇.论刑事诉讼中的认罪认罚从宽制度——一种针对内在逻辑与完善进路的探讨[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(2).
[3]左卫民,吕国凡.完善被告人认罪认罚从宽处理制度的若干思考[J].民主与法治,2015(4).
[4]韩旭.辩护律师核实证据问题研究[J].法学家,2016(2).
[5]韩旭.刑事诉讼中被追诉人及其家属证据知悉权研究[J].现代法学,2009(5).
[6]陈瑞华.论被告人的阅卷权[J].当代法学,2013(3).
[7]韩旭.被告人与律师之间的辩护冲突及其解决机制[J].法学研究,2010(6).
[8]管宇.刑事诉讼视角下辩护权界说[J].政法论坛,2007(6).
(1)参见全国人大常委会《关于授权最高人民法院、最高人民检察院在部分地区开展刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作的决定》。
基本信息:
DOI:10.16700/j.cnki.cn41-1157/c.2016.06.014
中图分类号:D926.5;D925.1
引用信息:
[1]韩旭.辩护律师在认罪认罚从宽制度中的有效参与[J].南都学坛,2016,36(06):65-69.DOI:10.16700/j.cnki.cn41-1157/c.2016.06.014.